Posts Tagged ‘trucker’

What You Need to Know about the FMCSA’s New Cell Phone Law for Truckers

Wednesday, February 8th, 2012

cell phoneIt was a typical day on the road.  John had just finished delivering his last shipment for the day and was headed back to the terminal.  Wondering what his wife wanted him to pick up for dinner that night, he grabbed his phone and dialed her number.  After a lengthy back and forth discussion over chicken or beef, they made their decision and John assured his wife he would be home within the next hour or so.  But what started as an 60 minutes turned out to be much longer.

For when John hung up from his wife, he put his phone down on his seat like he always did.  While rounding a sharp turn, his cell phone slid off the seat and landed onto the floor.  Reaching down to pick it up, John had no choice but to take his eyes of the road for a few seconds.  Those few seconds resulted in his truck swerving into the next lane, causing a three vehicle collision.

This incident, unfortunately, happens all the time which is why it is important to know the risks of cell phone usage while driving.  As John dialed his wife’s number, he did not realize that at that moment, his risk of having an accident increased by six times.  As he talked to her, his concentration level decreased by 37% and ranked in at the same level as those having a blood alcohol level of 0.08.  And although John managed to duck two bullets, he was not able to avoid the third fact…reaching for his phone would increase his risk of a crash by three times (Stats provided by distraction.gov).

But the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is hoping to prevent these risks from occurring through the establishment of new phone usage rules.

In 2010, the FMCSA prohibited texting for commercial drivers.  Not soon later, in early 2011, the rule was extended to include intrastate HAZMAT drivers.  But prohibiting just texting was found to be not enough.

Effective as of January 3rd, interstate truck drivers, as well as all HAZMAT drivers, are prohibited to use hand-held cell phones while operating their truck.

Strict penalties have been put into place to enforce the new ruling.  According to www.fmcsa.dot.gov, any driver caught in violation could face a maximum fine of $2,750 with carriers who allow their drivers to operate a vehicle while using a hand-held phone facing a fine of $11,000.  Those drivers issued “two or more serious traffic violations” will have their CDL suspended.

Although drivers are banned from utilizing hand-held phones while driving, the rule permits hands-free devices and single button functions.

According to Transport Topics, a driver is allowed “to reach for a phone, ‘provided the device is within the driver’s reach while he or she is in the normal seated position, with the seat belt fastened.’”  The site also explains that a driver cannot make a call while temporarily stopped on the road, but can pull over to do so.

Although carriers are prohibited to allow their driver to use a cell phone while operating their vehicle, facing a hefty fine if their driver is caught in violation, they are not required to have a written policy or training program (http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/about/other/faq/cellphone-ban-faqs.aspx).  As the FMCSA simply puts it, “The carrier is responsible for its drivers’ conduct.”

And many groups/individuals are not happy about it.  The American Trucking Association (ATA) is seeking changes in employer liability, notes the group’s Abigail Potter.  According to the ATA, “In an industry that has seen several of its unionized carriers fail in the past decade, this outright promotion of union interests is a threat to the hundreds of thousands of carriers that remain vital to the country’s economic recovery,” states an article on cvta.org.

But they are not alone.  As the National Federation of Independent Businesses’ Karen Harned argues, “Just when we thought we had seen it all from the NLRB, it has reached a new low in its zeal to punish small-business owners,” (http://www.cvta.org/member-news/associate-member-news.html?start=20).

And others agree with her, noting that the rule would force shipments to be delayed and affect business since drivers would have to take additional time away to pull over every time they need to utilize the phone.

The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) explained that although handheld cell phones are a distraction, so are hundreds of other devices, including electronics used by drivers each day, such as the CB radio, nsc.org states.

Another big argument addresses the fact that although the FMCSA is cutting back on hand-held distractions for truck drivers, that does not account for all of the noncommercial drivers who are using these same distractions.

So far, only 9 states ban hand-held cell phone usage and 35 states prohibit texting while driving, according to the Governors Highway Safety Administration’s website.

But will prohibiting hand-held phones really make a difference?  Let’s look at it this way, last year over 3,000 accidents that resulted in fatalities occurred due to a distracted driver (http://www.aaos.org/news/aaosnow/feb12/advocacy4.asp).

Take the Arkansas 16-year-old who passed away last August from a distracted driver.

The girl was walking back to her car after an accident she was involved in with a pick-up truck within a construction zone.  A tractor trailer driver, who was talking on his cellular device, had dropped his phone, and as he reached down to pick it up, hit the teenager, resulting in the fatality.

Not only is the driver but the carrier being recently charged for wrongful death by the teenager’s family, even though the driver violated the carrier’s phone policy.

Do you oppose or support the new law?  Should hands-free devices be prohibited as well? Do you think that carriers should face an $11,000 fine or do you believe that number is too harsh?

Finally, where do you believe the law should stop or start?  What about in dash navigation and entertainment systems you need to touch and take your eyes off the road?  Are they okay?  List your comments below.

click for quote

OOIDA Becomes Enraged at Second Cross-Border Agreement Signing Allowing Mexican Carriers to Begin Application Process

Thursday, July 7th, 2011

Yesterday, Ray LaHood, U.S. Transportation Secretary, signed an agreement that would abolish $2.4 billion worth the retaliatory tariffs Mexico placed on U.S. goods back in 2009, believing that doing so would lead to job creation.

U.S./Mexico

According to thetrucker.com, LaHood signed the final agreement with Mexico’s Arturo Pèrez-Jàcome, Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes Dionisio, stating that 50% of the retaliatory tariffs would be lifted within the next 10 days, removing the tariffs completely once the U.S. grants a Mexican carrier operating authority, which is expected to happen within the next upcoming months.

Mexican carriers are now permitted to register for the pilot program at any time, expecting the first carriers to start transporting goods in the U.S. by the end of August, the site notes.

But in order to be granted operating authority, Mexican carriers must meet certain requirements including:  “trucks will be required to comply with all Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards, they must have electronic monitoring systems to track Hours of Service compliance,” drivers must undergo drug testing and have their driving record carefully reviewed by the U.S. DOT, and knowledge and understanding of the “English language and U.S. traffic signs” (http://www.thetrucker.com/News/Stories/2011/7/6/Cross-bordertruckpactsignedtariffstoendMexicancarrierscanapplynow.aspx).

According to LaHood, “The agreements signed are a win for roadway safety and they are a win for trade.  By opening the door to long-haul trucking between the United States and Mexico, America’s third-largest trading partner, we will create jobs and opportunities for our people and support economic development in both nations,” thetrucker.com posted.

Although it is said that the cross-borders agreement will create more job opportunities, OOIDA believes otherwise.  In fact, the association expressed that the program would instead take away from U.S. jobs, especially those truckers working for small businesses.

OOIDA, who was strongly against the agreement in the first place stating that “Mexico has failed to institute regulations and enforcement programs that are even remotely similar to those in the United States and because there would be no relevant corresponding reciprocity for U.S. truckers,” is now irate with the fact that LaHood signed the agreement “without providing the public or Congress with the final details of the agreement,” believing him to be “sneaking down there to sign it” (http://www.thetrucker.com/News/Stories/2011/7/6/OOIDAUStruckersfumingoveragreementwithMexico.aspx).

OOIDA also fought the fact that U.S. taxpayers are spending their hard-earned money to provide EOBRS (electronic onboard recording devices) for these Mexican carriers operating in our country.

Do you support LaHood’s decision to sign the agreement or are you in favor of the OOIDA’s standpoint?  Post your comments below.

news on the trucking industry

Truckers Purchase Diesel at $2.20/gallon as Part of Massive Scheme

Tuesday, May 10th, 2011

After 18 months of investigation, authorities have finally uncovered those responsible for a Central Florida scheme involving the altering of vehicle-identification numbers and skimming of credit cards to retrieve diesel fuel from pumps.

skimming

“Operation V.I.N. Diesel” exposed 14 members involved in the crime, 13 of which were arrested, while the mastermind, Omilquer Garcia Perez, is still being sought after.

According to the Orange County Sheriff’s Office, Perez owned a fraudulent trucking company called A&A Trucking, which was the scheme’s headquarters.

There were three cleverly thought out parts to the system:

First, thieves would skim the credit cards of consumers in order to obtain their information.  As Corporal Rob Bell explained, “They didn’t even get out of their car. They’d use a small tool. They would open up the face of it (the pump) if it wasn’t secure, and place that skimmer inside in less than a minute. They would return later to retrieve the skimmer with the credit card information of all who used those pumps” (http://www.wdbo.com/news/news/local/orange-investigators-uncover-2-mill-credit-card-fr/nCc9j/).

Doing so, thieves were able to obtain 36,000 credit card numbers, an article on SunSentinel.com notes.

Members involved in the scheme then loaded 350 gallon containers onto stolen trucks in which they changed the vehicle-identification numbers of, used phony credit cards that they bought for $40 each, and using the credit card numbers from the skimming process, stole diesel fuel, the site explains.

Finally, the stolen diesel fuel was resold at A&A Trucking for $2.20-$2.50/gallon, in which the thieves obtained a profit of around $10,000 a day and nearly $2 million total due to the high number of truckers wanting to escape high diesel prices at the pump (http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-skimming-arrests-orange-20110509,0,5905179.story).

Those arrested face a variety of charges from grand theft auto to identity theft.

A&A Trucking is just another example of the rise in fraudulent trucking companies facing the industry today.

road scholar transport
Don’t have your LTL and TL freight get caught up in a scheme, ship with Road Scholar Transport, a company recognizable for its safety, reputation, and knowledge in the trucking industry.  Visit www.roadscholar.com today.

How do you think that the thieves managed to operate their fraudulent trucking company and sell diesel at extremely low prices for as long as they did without being caught?

Over 100 Hazmat Trucks Shut Down After PA Inspection

Thursday, September 30th, 2010

Pennsylvania police are cracking down on unsafe Hazmat carriers.

On September 22nd, state police routinely stopped truckers carrying Hazmat materials for inspection.

According to an article in truckinginfo.com:

  • 1,131 were pulled over
  • 1,034 received written warnings, many due to brake problems and “record of duty status violations”
  • 139 trucks were shut down
  • 32 drivers were put out of service
  • 572 were cited

Road Scholar Transport was not one of these violators.  We are a Hazmat certified carrier who has undergone emergency response procedure training, only operating with the safest measures.

Road Scholar Transport

Trucker Prohibited From Using Company’s Facilities, Told to Leave Grounds

Monday, September 27th, 2010

Imagine docking your trailer, asking to use the restroom, and being denied.  Better yet, imagine being told to relieve yourself behind your own trailer instead.  That’s what happened for Land Line driver Erwin Page.

After docking his truck at Ring Container Technologies, a food packaging facility, Page slept for a few hours, and once awake, asked one of Ring’s employees if he could use the facilities, an article in Trucking News notes.  The employee there told Page that drivers were restricted from using the inside facilities, and when Page expressed that there were no Port-a-Potties available, they responded by telling him to “just go back outside and pee behind” your “trailer by the dock like everybody else does” (http://www.truckflix.com/news_article.php?newsid=7083).

Calmly, Page insisted on speaking to a higher authority about the policy and received permission to use the facility, only to find out later that the company called Page’s dispatcher and told him that Page was to leave the premise and never come back, the site notes.

According to Trucking News, Land Line had to send in another driver to take over and bring the trailer back to Page, who waited at a truck stop.

The food packaging facility is not FDA regulated.

Ring Contain Technologies are being critized for “dehumanizing drivers” and truckers are comparing the treatment they are receiving to those of dogs (http://www.truckflix.com/news_article.php?newsid=7083).

Drivers never have to worry about being mistreated when working for Road Scholar Transport.  Just ask one of our drivers whose trusty companion (yes a dog) became a friend to all in the terminal.

Want to work for a company of equals?  Apply today at http://www.roadscholar.com/employment.html.

Road Scholar Transport

Truckers Attempt to Save Some Green by Going Green

Friday, August 27th, 2010

The trucking industry is showing attempts to go green in order to increase fuel efficiency and reduce gas emission.

The greenhouse gas reduction regulations, which went into effect this year in the state of California, have motivated technological advancements in trucks nationwide.  According to the California Air Resources Board (ARB)’s website, the regulation is estimated to save “truckers and trucking companies…about $8.6 billion when the diesel fuel consumption is reduced by as much as 750 million gallons in California and 5 billion gallons across the nation” (http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/hdghg/hdghg.htm).

One of the new technological advancements announced at the Great American Trucking Show, currently taking place in Dallas, TX from Aug. 26-28, would give a truck the ability to respond to approaching territory in efficient ways through the use of cruise control, an article on thetrucker.com explained.

Cruise control would be able to make use of “GPS and digital mapping techniques” to allow trucks to gradually increase speed when traveling uphill without all of a sudden “flooring it” and then reducing speed again when traveling straight (http://www.thetrucker.com/News/Stories/2010/8/26/Trucksofthefuturedrivenbycominggreenhousegasfuelefficiencyregs.aspx).

Less energy use and emission is important for our environment.  That’s why within the upcoming months, Road Scholar Transport will be bringing new tractors into the fleet that will emit far less diesel particulate than the 2004 engines; at a ratio of 1:42 trucks!

To learn more about Road Scholar Transport and our services visit www.roadscholar.com.

Road Scholar Transport