Posts Tagged ‘NTSB’

NTSB Recommends Mandatory Video Event Recorders and Collision Avoidance Systems in Trucks Following 2010 Crash

Thursday, December 15th, 2011

Last year’s fatal accident claiming two lives and injuring 38 others prompted the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) to recommend a ban on cell phone usage while driving, a proposal that will go into effect January 3rd of next year with a $2,750 fine for first offense drivers, maximum $11,000 fine for carriers allowing their drivers to use cell phones on the road, and the suspension of a driver’s CDL in cases of multiple offenses.

Along with a ban on cell phone usage, the NTSB has also recommended the mandatory usage/review of video event recorders on tractors as well as collision avoidance systems.

The accident took place in August of 2010 in Mo. when a fatigued pickup driver2010 crash was texting while driving, sending/receiving 11 texts within 11 minutes, striking a bobtail tractor trailer which had slowed down in a construction zone.  A school bus, filled with children who were on a field trip, in return hit the pickup due to the driver being distracted by a motorcoach which was parked on the shoulder at the time.  Another bus, also on a field trip, did not maintain a proper distance behind and was unable to stop, hitting the bus in front.

According to the NTSB, the events of the accident could have been “more definitely assessed” if the vehicles had video event recorders.

Although the NTSB cannot impose a law, its suggestions do carry a lot of weight.  Therefore, the NTSB recommends that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration do the following:

-“Require all heavy commercial vehicles to be equipped with video event recorders that capture data in connection with the driver and the outside environment and roadway in the event of a crash or sudden deceleration event. The device should create recordings that are easily accessible for review when conducting efficiency testing and system wide performance-monitoring programs” (http://www.ntsb.gov/news/events/2011/gray_summit_mo/index.html).

-“Require motor carriers to review and use video event recorder information in conjunction with other performance data to verify that driver actions are in accordance with company and regulatory rules and procedures essential to safety” (http://www.ntsb.gov/news/events/2011/gray_summit_mo/index.html).

On top of that, the NTSB encourages the following (provided by ntsb.gov):

-“Complete rulemaking on adaptive cruise control and collision warning system performance standards for new passenger cars. At a minimum, these standards should address obstacle detection distance, timing of alerts, and human factors guidelines, such as the mode and type of warning.”

-“Determine whether equipping commercial vehicles with collision warning systems with active braking and electronic stability control systems will reduce commercial vehicle accidents. If these technologies are determined to be effective in reducing accidents, require their use on commercial vehicles.”

Road Scholar Transport already applies crash prevention technology on our fleet to enhance the safety of your products.  Our trucks utilize the Bendix Wingman ACB System, allowing for our trucks to maintain a set distance of 8/10ths of a mile marker behind a forward vehicle.

When cruise control is off, the ACB will deliver a beeping alert, which gets faster and louder when closing in on a vehicle, as well as a visual warning on the dashboard showing how far the vehicle is from your truck.

When cruise control is on, the ACB will automatically reduce the throttle, use the engine retarder, or apply the brakes (delivering 1/3 the vehicle’s power with the driver applying the rest if needed) in order to maintain a set distance from the vehicle ahead.

Check out all of Road Scholar’s safety features at www.roadscholar.com and to get on board a safe carrier today.

What do you think of the NTSB’s recommendations?  Should video event recorders and collision avoidance systems become mandatory?  List your comments below.

Who’s at Fault? FMCSA Contemplates Use of DataQ to Determine Accountability During an Accident

Friday, May 13th, 2011

Debate over the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)’s idea of using the DataQ system to record who is at fault during an accident has stirred a differential of opinions at a recent forum held by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).

FMCSA

In a question and answer session, the FMCSA announced the possibility of using the current DataQ system, “which carriers use now to correct mistakes that have gotten into their CSA scores” to record police reports stating who is at fault in an accident (http://www.truckinginfo.com/news/news-detail.asp?news_id=73760).

According to an article in truckinginfo.com, the FMCSA is looking into recording all accidents (“unless a carrier files an accident report through DataQs”) and eventually hire a contractor who will then determine if the carrier is at fault prior to it being entered.

The FMCSA’s consideration has formed a mixture of opinions.

On one side is support of the idea with the belief that it will promote safety and CSA performance by stating if the carrier was responsible for an accident instead of just that a crash had occurred, as well as details about whether the accident could have been prevented, one reason why the American Trucking Association (ATA) favors the idea of hiring a contractor.

On the other side, the ATA, and others, have concerns.

ATA Vice President of Safety Policy Rob Abbott notes, “The approach would put the onus on the carrier to initiate the process and under the CSA system, which measures one carrier’s performance against its peers, it’s important that the database include all crashes and not just those that carriers elect to challenge,” (http://www.truckinginfo.com/news/news-detail.asp?news_id=73760).

Another opinion, given by a member of the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance, warns that even if the organization hired a contractor to review police reports, the level of knowledge each police officer has in investigating trucking accidents varies, the site explains.

The NTSB, however, is experienced in investigating these types of crashes and aim to discover preventative means.

A Safe Carrier

A Safe Carrier

Road Scholar Transport knows safety.  That’s why we have never been cited for a piece of faulty equipment in an accident due to daily maintenance, newer equipment, and a knowledgeable/experienced team.

Check out our DOT Motor Carrier Safety Certificate at www.roadscholar.com and jump onboard a safe carrier today.

Do you think the FMCSA should use the DataQ system to record accident accountability?