Posts Tagged ‘CSA score’

Enforcing the Guidelines: Nearly 300 Drivers Removed in FMCSA Annual Drug and Alcohol Sweep. Are You Conducting Proper Testing?

Friday, June 29th, 2012
alcohol-related crash fatalities

According to www.bts.gov, there were 13,365 alcohol-related crash fatalities in 2010.

Did you know…“Every two hours, three people are killed in alcohol-related highway crashes.”1 That’s over 13,000 fatalities annually not to mention over 4 million Americans who drive under the influence each year.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration has been cracking down on drivers operating while under the influence and promoting safety in their annual drug and alcohol sweep which took place from April 30th through May 11th.

During this sweep, which analyzed the safety records of commercial bus and truck drivers, authorities removed 287 drivers from the road with an additional 128 companies facing action.2

Investigators found that several of the drivers tried to dodge drug and alcohol testing as well as notifying of past reports by switching employers.3 Several companies were cited for using drivers who had tested positive as well as never applied a test procedure policy to their company.2

Road Scholar Transport implements a drug and alcohol testing program.  Not only do we drug test every new hire, but 50% of drivers of every year, as well as IF there is an accident where a vehicle is either towed or resulted in an injury.  In fact, Road Scholar maintains NO controlled substances and alcohol violations in our CSA score.

Drivers and carriers caught in the FMCSA’s sweep are looking at a fine as well as being banned from operating a truck.  As the FMCSA’s Anne Ferro explains, “”Removing these dangerous drivers from the roads helps save lives and sends a strong signal that we will not tolerate negligent commercial drivers and companies that violate federal alcohol and drug safety standards.” 2

The FMCSA guidelines of drug & alcohol include (provided by http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regulations/topics/drug/engtesting.htm):

-Mandatory drug and alcohol testing for CDL drivers.

-Post-accident, reasonable suspicion, random, and return to duty/follow up alcohol testing.

-Pre-employment, reasonable suspicion, post-accident, random, and return to duty/follow up drug testing.

-Responsibility rests upon the employer to conduct random and spontaneous drug tests on at least 50% of their drivers annually.

To view the FMCSA’s complete alcohol and drug rules click here.

As an advocate of driver safety on the road, we are providing you with ten ways that carriers fail to comply with drug and alcohol mandates so you know what steps to avoid citations.  (The following information is provided by Work Truck Magazine)

1.  Failing to Implement a Program

2.  Failure to decide to test the appropriate people

3.  Failure to “establish or maintain a random selection process.”

4.  Failing to test a driver prior to employment or allowing a driver to operate the truck before receiving test results

5.  Ignoring past occurrences in which the driver tested positive.

6.  Failing to test within the 8 hour deadline after an alcohol related accident and 32-hours after a drug-related.

7.  Failing to retain records

8.  “Many carriers – and medical examiners – automatically request a DOT drug screen when a driver renews his or her medical certification. “Other,” “annual,” or “recertification” is not a required DOT test type. Testing under this circumstance is actually a violation of §382.113 (misrepresentation) and could result in potential liability, especially if the results are positive.”

9.  Giving drivers advanced notice of a test.  Instead, they should be take immediately to the testing site.

10.  “Driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol in a personal vehicle affects the CDL based on §383.51, but has no bearing on a driver’s participation in a DOT drug and alcohol testing program. A driver cannot be forced to undergo an SAP program since it is not mandated by the FMCSA. However, a conviction resulting from operating a CDL vehicle is “actual knowledge” and is a violation under Part 382.

What are you doing to adhere to the FMCSA’s guidelines on drug and alcohol testing?  Are the guidelines strict enough or should they be altered?  List your comments below.

1http://www.bts.gov/publications/drunk_driving_by_the_numbers/index.html

2http://www.truckinginfo.com/news/news-detail.asp?news_id=77316

3http://www.ttnews.com/articles/basetemplate.aspx?storyid=29616&t=FMCSA-Removes-287-Drivers-in-Drug-and-Alcohol-Investigation

FMCSA Plans More Efficient CSA Accident Rating System by January 2012

Monday, July 18th, 2011

Carriers are complaining about high CSA crash scores reflecting accidents in which their trucks were not at fault.  The only way to challenge these scores is through a safety audit.  But that’s about to change.

CSA score

Trucking companies will soon be able to appeal who’s accountable for an accident, with a long-term plan aiming to determine accountability before the accident is even registered and factored into the scoring process.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has developed both a short-term and long-term goal for easing carrier complaints.

In short-term, crashes continue to be documented into the CSA database, however, carriers will then be given the option of using a system developed by the FMCSA allowing them to challenge the accountability of an accident by submitting a police report through the CSA data correction system, DataQ, an article in truckinginfo.com notes.

The submitted report will then be analyzed by a group of specialists “who prepared the agency’s definitive Large Truck Crash Causation Study and a related study on automobiles prepared for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration” to determine accountability (http://www.truckinginfo.com/news/news-detail.asp?news_id=74200).

In order to test the accuracy of these specialists, the FMCSA had researchers from the automobile study determine who was accountable for accidents presented in the truck study.  The agency then compared these findings to the specialists’, finding that the two groups agreed with who was at fault during an accident 92% of the time, assuring the agency that studying the police report from crashes would correctly determine who was at fault the majority of time, truckinginfo.com explains.

Of course, there would still be a chance for a carrier to be incorrectly charged at fault for an accident.  In cases such as these, a carrier can then appeal the decision.

Although all accidents will still be recorded in the CSA system, those carriers at fault will be scored heavier then those held non-accountable for an accident.

This system is expected to begin in January.

The FMCSA, however, plans on creating a long-term goal, which takes an extended period of time to develop based on its complexity.  This system will examine the 120,000 to 140,000 reported crashes every year, omitting no-fault accidents before they can affect a carrier’s score, the article continues.

But as the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance’s Steve Keppler explains, this method poses problems when the “reviewer makes a determination on accountability that is different than the officer,” who was actually on the scene, or when their determination differs from the insurance company’s investigation.

Road Scholar Transport

What do you think about the FMCSA’s plan?  Do you support the idea or do you feel that a different approach should be taken?

Be sure to check out Road Scholar Transport’s CSA rating at http://ai.fmcsa.dot.gov/SMS/Data/carrier.aspx?enc=l05Z/rb3sYgqvgOzAB2Xgqm8glUOB4DLxD9aRMx/xK4= and visit www.roadscholar.com to jump onboard a safe carrier.

want a safe carrier