Posts Tagged ‘brokers’

TCP Business Expectations Survey: As Carriers Continue to Shy Away From 3PL Providers, Higher Spot Quotes Draw Brokerage Usage Up

Wednesday, April 11th, 2012

According to Transport Capital Partners (TCP)’s First Quarter 2012 Business Expectations Survey, the majority of carriers reported utilizing broker services as a means of obtaining freight lanes less within the last 90 days compared to previous months.

survey

The survey shows that 67% of carriers have drifted away from brokers in the last three months, slightly lower than last year in which 86% acknowledged drawing away from 3rd party logistic services in February 2011 and 82% in August 2011, yet accounting for over twice the number of carriers pulling away in May 2009 (which was around 31%). 1

On top of that, TCP’s Richard Mikes explains that in a time where capacity is tight, more and more carriers are turning towards forming their own brokerage arms. 2

And with concerns over vicarious liability, chameleon carriers, double brokerage, and false 3pls, among other issues, shippers are becoming more careful on who they trust to transport their freight, vetting out carriers based on safety scores.

Let’s look at a recent ruling involving a double brokerage scheme.  Between 2004 and 2005, Kulwant Singh Gill operated as a California broker under several false names in order to obtain loads posted on brokerage loads.  Presenting false social security and driver’s license numbers, Gill presented himself as transporting the loads himself, and once given the load, would then repost the lane as a broker, handing off the load to another carrier.  Once the shipment was transported, Gill was paid by the original broker and never compensated the actual carrier, scheming over 100 trucking companies. 3

Gill was indicted in 2006 and again in 2008 for continuing his scheme, being found guilty in 2009.  After continuing to double broker loads, the court sentenced Gill to 10 years, 10 months in jail and ordered to pay $443,388 in restitution on March 28, 2012. 3

But despite the majority of carriers shying away from brokers, better rates have led to an increase in the number of carriers using 3rd parties.

Looking at TCP’s survey, 33% of carriers stated that they have increased their broker utilization in the last three months.  This number increased from 15% in August 2011 and 12% in February 2011 but is still less than May 2009 which reported 65%. 1

TCP gives the reasoning of higher spot quotes compared to contract rates (along with the need to fill lanes) to account for this brokerage increase.  As TCP’s Lana Batts explains, trucking companies, especially larger carriers, “are going back to brokerages because there is a shortage of equipment and they are getting better spot market rates than they are getting out of their contract rates.” 4

Although only 45% of carriers recently increased their rates, 77% believe that freight volumes will increase within the next year, which Batts believes will lead to an upward rate trend, spiking in early summer, and leading more carriers to utilize brokers since “carriers can get more money for non-contractual freight,” she states. 5

Need help deciding on whether to choose an asset-based carrier or a broker?  We’ve constructed a list of what an asset-based carrier, such as Road Scholar Transport, can provide versus a typical 3PL broker below.

broker vs. rst

click to enlarge

From your experience, what do you consider to be the benefits of utilizing an asset-based carrier over a broker?

1http://www.truckinginfo.com/news/news-detail.asp?news_id=76593

2http://www.truckinginfo.com/trucks-trailers/news-detail.asp?news_id=74969&news_category_id=29

3http://www.overdriveonline.com/broker-sentenced-11-years-for-defrauding-carriers/?pg=1

4http://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/tcp_survey_shows_that_carriers_continue_to_be_active_in_the_spot_market/

5http://www.ontruck.org/imispublic/Home/AM/ContentManagerNet/ContentDisplay.aspx?Section=Home&ContentID=10822

Brokers/Carriers Losing Business as More Shippers Choose Carriers Based on CSA Scores

Thursday, January 12th, 2012

CSA 2010CSA 2010’s Safety Measurement System (SMS), which scores carriers and drivers’ safety performance in seven BASIC categories (Unsafe Driving, Fatigued Driving/Hours of Service, Driver Fitness, Controlled Substances/Alcohol, Vehicle Maintenance, Cargo-Related, and Crash-Indicator) placing those considered a risk on “alert” status, has had members of the trucking industry arguing over a flawed system.  This disapproval has grown by many brokers and carriers who are complaining that they are losing significant business with some of their major accounts due to their safety scores.

Not only are carriers losing business, but brokers are being held responsible for not researching the safety scores of the carriers they vet out.  If they did they would find Road Scholar Transport to have an excellent safety rating with zero alerts and no controlled substance/alcohol violations.  Check out how Road Scholar scored in each category at http://ai.fmcsa.dot.gov/SMS/Data/carrier.aspx?enc=Y8fZXERG1J+xGf6mXx3ODG9066yI6×3GHlkVnRjszjw=.

The search for finding the cheapest rate often results in choosing unsafe carriers to haul a shipper’s freight, but with the CSA 2010, shippers are becoming more aware of the process, discontinuing business with many 3pls who do not use safety measures when choosing carriers.

As Transport Topics notes, some brokers have lost thousands of shipments for this reason, defending their SMS scores  stating that “shippers impose unrealistic contract requirements based on the SMS scores that bar using a carrier that has even a single infraction,” claiming that the system “unfairly taints fleet safety records.”

Brokers and truckload carriers objecting to the SMS process also did so believing that “safety should be judged by FMCSA’s professionals rather than clerical workers” (http://www.ttnews.com/articles/basetemplate.aspx?storyid=28458).

While trucking companies are being turned down for their CSA scores, Road Scholar Transport continues to provide top LTL and truckload services for our customers.  Besides low SMS scores, Road Scholar has never been cited for a piece of faulty equipment in an accident and with over 31,000 delivers in 2010, only had 3 damage claims.  That’s a ratio of 0.0003%.

Experience the safety and security of knowing that your freight is in good hands by visiting www.roadscholar.com today.

Do you feel that more and more carriers and brokers will lose customers/perhaps even shut their doors due to shippers choosing more secure carriers based on SMS scores?  List your comments below.

click for quote

Trucking Company’s Safety Record Questioned after Amtrak Accident

Monday, June 27th, 2011

Accident prevention, brand equity, liability cases…all good reasons to take the time to review a carrier’s safety record before trusting them with your freight.  But many times shippers choose to conduct business with third-parties (brokers), not knowing who is handling their freight, and thus, running the risk of shipping with a trucking company who is on an “alert” status for unsafe driving.

Let’s pretend that you (the shipper) are given two options.

Option 1: You can choose a carrier who has been cited for two crashes within the past two years, has a history of citations for faulty equipment, and earlier this year, had a truck ordered off the road for safety issues.

Then you would choose a company such as John Davis Trucking, whose series of violations and unsafe driving have been surfacing after their involvement in an accident which resulted in fatalities last Friday.

John Davis Trucking, located in Nevada, made the news when it hit two of ten railcars traveling to California.  According to thetrucker.com, the company “skidded the length of a football field before crashing into the train,” killing the driver, four passengers, and a conductor.

As National Transportation Safety Board’s Earl Weener explained, the driver should have saw the crossing’s flashing warning lights from a half-mile away (when traveling at 70-mph) (http://www.thetrucker.com/News/Stories/2011/6/27/TruckcompanyinNevadatrainwreckhadcitations.aspx).

The two trucks following John Davis Trucking managed to stop and although the engineer hit the emergency brake, he was unable to stop in time, as the trucking company crashed through the crossing gates.

Why did this happen?  According to authorities, there are so many scenarios to consider that it may take up to a year to determine the cause, thetrucker.com explains.

But are there suspicions over the trucking company and driver?  The answer is yes.

When looking at John Davis Trucking’s safety record, authorities found that this was not the first crash the company had encountered.  In fact, they were cited with two fairly recent crashes, one in October of 2009 and another within four months which led to injuries.

Not only did the company have two accidents within the last two years, but 16 maintenance violations, seven within the past year, and one that took their truck out of service due to the tire threads on the tractor-trailer being exposed, according to thetrucker.com.

In addition to that, the company has been cited for “the driver failing to use a seat belt, an equipment defect on the rig’s hydraulic brake system, lane restriction violations, cargo violations that included prohibited hazardous material markings on packages one driver was carrying, and labeling problems” (http://www.thetrucker.com/News/Stories/2011/6/27/TruckcompanyinNevadatrainwreckhadcitations.aspx).

Authorities continue to decipher the exact cause of the accident.

But if you don’t like option one there’s always…

Option 2: You can choose a carrier who has NEVER been cited for a piece of faulty equipment involved in an accident, has zero alert statuses, anti-crash technology that allows a set distance between the truck and a forward vehicle, and a reputable safety record.

Then you would choose a company such as Road Scholar TransportRoad Scholar’s CSA 2010’s Safety Measurement System (SMS) rating, which scores a carrier and driver’s safety performance in seven BASIC categories, placing those with a score of 65% or higher on an “alert” status, resulted in zero drug and controlled substance violations and scores way below the 65% mark.

Check out Road Scholar’s CSA rating at http://ai.fmcsa.dot.gov/SMS/Data/carrier.aspx?enc=l05Z/rb3sYgqvgOzAB2Xgqm8glUOB4DLxD9aRMx/xK4=

Which option would you choose?

want a safe carrier